The Washington Commanders and Philadelphia Eagles have had their fair share of heated matchups in the NFL, offering fans thrilling moments, impressive plays, and intense competition. With the 2025 season unfolding, it’s the perfect time to dive into the analysis of their latest showdown, where both teams have demonstrated growth and improvement. In this blog post, we will break down key game stats, player performances, and tactical insights from the Washington Commanders vs Philadelphia Eagles game.
Washington Commanders vs Philadelphia Eagles: A Quick Overview
Before we dive into the numbers, let’s recap the significance of this matchup. The Commanders and Eagles are two prominent NFC East teams, with a longstanding rivalry dating back to the inception of the NFL. The Eagles, with their championship pedigree, consistently enter the game as one of the league’s most talented and dangerous squads. On the other hand, the Washington Commanders have been slowly building a competitive roster, making this game crucial for both teams’ playoff aspirations.
The most recent game saw the Eagles as the favorites, but the Commanders were determined to make a statement. As both teams look to solidify their positions in the standings, here are the stats that shaped this exciting clash.
Key Game Stats
1. Total Yards: Commanders vs Eagles
Washington Commanders: 350 yards
Philadelphia Eagles: 425 yards
One of the most telling stats in any football game is total yardage, and this game was no exception. The Eagles, despite the Commanders’ strong defense, gained more yards overall. The difference in total yards can often be a reflection of the efficiency of the offense and how well the defense can handle the opposing team’s plays.
The Eagles’ offensive line did a solid job of protecting quarterback Jalen Hurts, allowing him to throw for significant yardage. On the other hand, the Commanders showed resilience but were limited in their ability to gain consistent yardage against Philadelphia’s strong defense.
2. Quarterback Performance: Jalen Hurts vs Sam Howell
Jalen Hurts (Philadelphia Eagles):
Completions: 24/35
Passing Yards: 315 yards
Touchdowns: 3
Interceptions: 1
Rushing Yards: 25 yards
Rushing Touchdowns: 1
Sam Howell (Washington Commanders):
Completions: 21/34
Passing Yards: 215 yards
Touchdowns: 1
Interceptions: 2
Rushing Yards: 10 yards
Jalen Hurts was the standout quarterback in this game, showcasing his dual-threat capability. His 315 passing yards and 3 touchdowns were a testament to his ability to carve through the Commanders’ defense. Moreover, his rushing touchdown demonstrated his versatility and ability to make plays with his legs.
For the Commanders, Sam Howell had a solid but less effective performance. With 215 passing yards and a lone touchdown, he struggled to maintain consistency throughout the game. His two interceptions were costly, and they highlighted some areas that need improvement as the Commanders move forward.
3. Rushing Game: A Key Factor in Offensive Strategy
Washington Commanders:
Total Rushing Yards: 100 yards
Rushing Touchdowns: 1
Top Rusher: Brian Robinson Jr. (75 yards, 1 touchdown)
Philadelphia Eagles:
Total Rushing Yards: 150 yards
Rushing Touchdowns: 1
Top Rusher: Miles Sanders (90 yards, 1 touchdown)
The rushing game played a pivotal role in this contest. The Eagles’ offensive line paved the way for Miles Sanders to rush for 90 yards, while Jalen Hurts also contributed with a solid rushing touchdown. Philadelphia’s ability to control the ground game helped them maintain offensive balance and set up their passing attack.
In comparison, the Washington Commanders had a more modest performance on the ground. Brian Robinson Jr. led the way with 75 yards and a touchdown, but the Commanders struggled to move the ball effectively in the rushing game when they needed to.
4. Defensive Highlights: Commanders’ Pass Rush vs Eagles’ Secondary
The defensive line of the Washington Commanders was able to put pressure on Hurts for parts of the game. The Commanders recorded 3 sacks, with edge rusher Chase Young contributing one of those sacks. However, Hurts’ ability to escape the pocket and extend plays kept the Eagles’ offense moving.
On the other side, the Eagles’ secondary, led by Darius Slay and James Bradberry, played a key role in limiting Washington’s passing game. Slay intercepted Howell once, and the defense held the Commanders to just 215 passing yards despite several key opportunities for Washington to make big plays.
5. Turnovers: A Decisive Factor in the Outcome
Turnovers:
Washington Commanders: 2 (2 interceptions)
Philadelphia Eagles: 1 (1 interception)
Turnovers are often the turning point in any football game, and this matchup was no exception. Washington’s Sam Howell threw two costly interceptions, which gave the Eagles the opportunity to capitalize on short fields and score points. Although Jalen Hurts also threw an interception, it didn’t disrupt the flow of the Eagles’ offense as much as Howell’s mistakes did to the Commanders.
6. Special Teams: Field Goals and Punt Returns
In terms of special teams, both teams had relatively stable performances. Eagles kicker Jake Elliott converted both of his field goal attempts, one of which came in a critical moment in the third quarter to extend their lead.
Washington’s special teams had a couple of nice returns, but the field positioning was often not in their favor due to the Eagles’ efficient offense.
Tactical Breakdown: Commanders’ Strategy vs Eagles’ Dominance
Washington Commanders’ Approach
The Commanders entered the game with a strong defensive focus, attempting to pressure Hurts and force him into mistakes. While they were successful in generating some sacks, Hurts’ ability to evade pressure and use his legs kept Philadelphia’s offense moving. Offensively, Washington relied on short and intermediate passing plays but struggled to break through the Eagles’ tough secondary.
Philadelphia Eagles’ Dominance
The Eagles’ strategy was simple but effective: balance. They balanced the run and pass effectively, allowing Hurts to dictate the pace of the game. Their offensive line dominated the line of scrimmage, enabling Sanders to find holes in the Commanders’ defense and Hurts to have time to execute the passing game. The Eagles’ defense also stifled Washington’s offensive progress, limiting big plays and forcing turnovers.
Conclusion
The game between the Washington Commanders and Philadelphia Eagles was an exciting battle that showcased both teams’ strengths and weaknesses. The Eagles were able to outlast the Commanders due to their balanced offensive attack, timely defense, and overall efficiency in key moments. While Washington showed flashes of brilliance, particularly in the first half, they couldn’t capitalize on opportunities and were hindered by turnovers.
Looking ahead, both teams will likely make adjustments, with Washington needing to improve its passing game and turnover ratio, while the Eagles will continue to build on their offensive and defensive cohesion as they chase a playoff spot. Stay tuned for future matchups in this fierce NFC East rivalry.